Anglo-French

Voir dire

vwahr deer
A legal process where attorneys question potential jurors to assess their qualifications and suitability for a case.
During voir dire, the attorney asked potential jurors about their personal experiences and opinions to assess their impartiality.

Real-Case Example:

In the Batson v. Kentucky (1986) case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that using peremptory challenges to exclude jurors based on race violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This case demonstrates the importance of voir dire in identifying potential biases that could affect the fairness of a trial.

← Back to BrowseNext Term →

Frequently Asked Questions

The purpose of voir dire is to ensure a fair and impartial jury. Attorneys use voir dire to identify jurors who may be biased or unqualified to serve on the case.

Attorneys may ask jurors about their background, experiences, knowledge of the law, and potential biases related to the case.

A juror can be excused for cause (e.g., if they have a personal connection to the case) or by using a peremptory challenge (limited number of challenges allowed without needing a reason).

See all that Filevine can do with a customized demonstration from our team

Schedule a Demo